109520872980760006

I struggle to read when travelling on aircraft, but with deadlines looming and more than 60 hours of transit time to fill, I tried to read a few books at least. Of the batch I attempted the book I’d been most looking forward to was Michael Chabon’s second McSweeney’s anthology, McSweeney’s Enchanted Chamber of Astonishing Stories. While I thought the first book was a little uneven and somewhat over hyped, it still had some top notch work, and I’d hoped the second book would be even better.

When I looked down the table of contents and saw Margaret Atwood, David Mitchell, Jonathan Lethem, Steve Erickson, Stephen King, Roddy Doyle, Poppy Brite, China Mieville, Joyce Carole Oates, and Peter Straub listed I really thought I was in for a treat. However, overall, the book was a disappointment. A lot of the stories were unfocussed and just didn’t add up to much. There are also a couple I need to re-read to be sure what I think. Still, the highlight of the book is a new novelette by Stephen King, “Lisey and the Madman”. Clearly echoing King’s recent concerns about writers and their safety, the story tells of the attempted murder of a famous writer, as told by his wife. It’s powerful, moving and heads like a freight-train to its conclusion. Unfortunately for year’s best anthologists, it’s basically a mainstream story, but every reader should try to check it out. I thought Joyce Carole Oates distinctly weird “The Fabled Light House at Vina Del Mar” was the best weird horror story I’d read in years, China Mieville’s almost metafictional “Reports of Certain Events in London” was just engagingly weird, and Peter Straub’s “Mr Aickman’s Air Rifle” was as good as anything he’s written of late. For my money those four stories alone make the book worth the price of admission.

One of the things some reviewers will probably respond to is Chabon’s editorial, which suggests that the role of book’s like the McSweeney’s anthologies is to reinvigorate the modern short story. I’m not sure it’ll do that, and I’m not sure it’s really important what anthologists say in their introductions, but his book is worth approaching (if with some caution).

PS: Readers eager for a second instalment of Chabon’s “The Martian Agent” will be disappointed. Apparently deadlines didn’t permit, but perhaps the tale will be picked up in the next book.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.