Comments on: Conjure schedule

By: Dave Luckett

Dave Luckett — Tue, 04 Apr 2006 15:02:28 +0000

I am now told that you’re on it, Nichols is off it, and Russell B Farr is on it instead. Again, I ask: Are sandgropers the only reviewers they could rope in?

By: Jonathan

Jonathan — Sun, 02 Apr 2006 09:14:39 +0000

I had to ask them to put me on the panel on reviewing. I was down for a panel on whether you should join a writer’s workshop. I pointed out that I didn’t know much about such things, but that I had some experience with reviewing and so on.

By: Dave Luckett

Dave Luckett — Sun, 02 Apr 2006 08:10:44 +0000

I’m on that panel, too, I’ve been told, and I didn’t see your name on it at first. I told them that if you weren’t on it, it was either because you weren’t available, or that they were mad. So’s Nichols. On it, that is, not mad – though come to think of it….

Are we to believe that the only people they could find for a panel on reviewing in Brisbane were all sandgropers?

By: Bruce Chrumka

Bruce Chrumka — Sat, 01 Apr 2006 01:52:33 +0000

Yes, there were 21 of those gems, all of which I’ve sclepped through countless moves.

I put together my own take on ToCs for the Best of Roger Zelazny, Harlan Ellison, Gene Wolfe, and others. NOT 350 pages…more like 600-700. Sigh, indeed.