browser icon
You are using an insecure version of your web browser. Please update your browser!
Using an outdated browser makes your computer unsafe. For a safer, faster, more enjoyable user experience, please update your browser today or try a newer browser.

The Ashes in 2009

Posted by on December 29, 2006

I don’t talk about sport much here because, mostly, it doesn’t fit. Still. As many of you know, Australia is currently leading ‘the stinking surrender monkeys’ four nil in the latest Ashes series. This is a simply a restoration of the normal order of things. Now, some people are starting to talk about how things will change when Australia next plays in an Ashes series. This will be in England in 2009. By that time a number of very important Australian players will have retired from the game, and new players will have been blooded to fill out the team.  The talk is that this will make Australia more beatable, give England a realistic chance of winner. I don’t think so, and here’s why. Despite losing champions from this champion team, what Australia does have is a champion system. It produces excellent players. We also have a deeply established culture of competitiveness, of professionalism, of pushing to win that has been embedded over the captaincies of Border, Taylor, Waugh and now Ponting. This just won’t ‘go away’. No matter how the personnel change in either the Australian or the England teams (and some of these stinking surrender monkeys will go too, don’t doubt that), Australia will take the field in 2009 believing it WILL win. That will be the difference.

2 Responses to The Ashes in 2009

  1. Justine Larbalestier

    I agree with you. But, of course, that’s what we believed last Ashes. And they won.

    The difference of course is that they won it by the narrowest of margins. I mean really over the whole course of the 2005 series it was what three runs that separated the teams? The English with their MBEs and carry on seem to have completely forgotten how narrow the victory was.

    I do think they’ve got a shot at winning in England. They’re much better at home. So are we. But our much better at home leads to 4-1 victories and probably on this occasion 5-0. Their much better at home is to narrowly squeak in a win.

    We made bad descisions in 2005 but we did not lay down and die.

  2. Justine Larbalestier

    And how come you think it’s inappropriate to talk about cricket on your blog? It’s your blog! You can talk about whatever you want to talk about!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>