I feel for writers, I do. You work hard, you put all of yourself into your work, and do your very best. Your work gets published, and then the messages you get back from readers is weird beyond measure. Yesterday I read a review of an anthology I edited. In it the reviewer, who I respect, called one of the stories in the book ‘terrible’. I don’t think it is, and was a little non-plussed. Then this morning I received an email from someone else who I respect a great deal, and by purest chance they mentioned the same story and called it close to perfect. I find that fascinating. And no, I won’t name the story because the author doesn’t need thje grief. But, very interesting.
-
Archives
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
-
Meta
I’m not entirely surprised by this. The voting patterns in the short fiction categories of the Hugos suggest that people’s ideas of what makes a good piece of short fiction vary wildly. And one of the reasons I never liked reviewing short fiction is that there’s so much less to get a handle on to explain why a given story didn’t work for you. That plus the fact that you are generally covering a collection, magazine or anthology full of stories often leads to lazy short cuts such as simply describing a story as “terrible” or “perfect”.
Of course if you are daft enough to read reviews on Amazon you’ll find just as much divergence of views about novels there. And yeah, it must be frustrating.
I know that story and I totally agree with the reviews.
Ah, if only we knew the secret of writing something that appealed to everybody…
Except that I certainly wouldn’t like to live in that kind of world.
It happens. It’s happened with several stories we published (at Interzone), and I’ve had to tell a few authors — who were a bit dismayed by the negative reviews — not to worry, as the good ones would come, too (and they did). It continues to happen.
I’ve experienced it myself as a writer: one reviewer thought that my story “…left me with the irritating feeling of having totally wasted my time”, while another thought that “…this is how experimental writing should be, but rarely is.” Or a more recent one, where opinions varied from “I’m uncertain if one would properly write a review of “Xxxx” or a doctoral dissertation on it” to “at the sentence level whole stretches of the story could just as easily have been written in a foreign language, but regardless of that the overarching structure of the story made perfect sense” and to “For SF that stretched my brain, I was blown away by “Xxxx”.
Once a story is published, it’s game. Writers (and publishers) need to cope with that, and take it in stride. It’s only when a reviewer makes a factual error that one should react.
Like Cheryl and Glenda, I think there is no such thing as a story that *everybody* likes. I’ll go a step further: I think that a story that provokes both very strong positive and negative feelings, is doing something right (my own shit excepted, of course).