<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sending me electronic files for review and year&#8217;s bests&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jonathanstrahan.com.au/wp/2008/05/27/sending-me-electronic-files-for-review-and-years-bests/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jonathanstrahan.com.au/wp/2008/05/27/sending-me-electronic-files-for-review-and-years-bests/</link>
	<description>...science fiction and other stuff from jonathan strahan...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:37:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.jonathanstrahan.com.au/wp/2008/05/27/sending-me-electronic-files-for-review-and-years-bests/comment-page-1/#comment-158667</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 01:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonathanstrahan.com.au/wp/2008/05/27/sending-me-electronic-files-for-review-and-years-bests/#comment-158667</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t disagree, which is why I didn&#039;t just change my approach.  While I&#039;d prefer to receive printed copies of anthologies, magazines, and collections, I&#039;m going to continue to accept e-copy for the year&#039;s best.  I&#039;m not so sure about novels, though, which I get to see for my reviews editor gig. I do read some novels online, but it&#039;s a bit much for me.  My middle-aged eyes are starting to revolt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t disagree, which is why I didn&#8217;t just change my approach.  While I&#8217;d prefer to receive printed copies of anthologies, magazines, and collections, I&#8217;m going to continue to accept e-copy for the year&#8217;s best.  I&#8217;m not so sure about novels, though, which I get to see for my reviews editor gig. I do read some novels online, but it&#8217;s a bit much for me.  My middle-aged eyes are starting to revolt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff VanderMeer</title>
		<link>http://www.jonathanstrahan.com.au/wp/2008/05/27/sending-me-electronic-files-for-review-and-years-bests/comment-page-1/#comment-158655</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff VanderMeer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 01:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonathanstrahan.com.au/wp/2008/05/27/sending-me-electronic-files-for-review-and-years-bests/#comment-158655</guid>
		<description>Frankly, this would be returning to the age of the dinosaurs. It&#039;s clear enough for best-of reading whether something is to be held for further consideration or not from a read online. I think reading novels on a screen is a bit much, but for short fiction in collections or anthologies it&#039;s no real hardship. PDFs are meant to be read on a screen as much as on the page. Also consider that you live in Australia and the US postal service has made it very expensive to ship stuff to you. 

Editors who don&#039;t read stuff off a screen are going to be very rare very soon.

Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frankly, this would be returning to the age of the dinosaurs. It&#8217;s clear enough for best-of reading whether something is to be held for further consideration or not from a read online. I think reading novels on a screen is a bit much, but for short fiction in collections or anthologies it&#8217;s no real hardship. PDFs are meant to be read on a screen as much as on the page. Also consider that you live in Australia and the US postal service has made it very expensive to ship stuff to you. </p>
<p>Editors who don&#8217;t read stuff off a screen are going to be very rare very soon.</p>
<p>Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Horton</title>
		<link>http://www.jonathanstrahan.com.au/wp/2008/05/27/sending-me-electronic-files-for-review-and-years-bests/comment-page-1/#comment-151788</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Horton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 11:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonathanstrahan.com.au/wp/2008/05/27/sending-me-electronic-files-for-review-and-years-bests/#comment-151788</guid>
		<description>I have the same problems, Jonathan. I love getting all the &quot;free&quot; stuff but it&#039;s not so free when you print it out. And word or even text formats work better than .pdf, even though .pdf documents are MUCH prettier, simply because a word document, properly reduced, might print in 1/3 as many pages as a .pdf.

(Printed galleys or ARCs are still better, but I do sympathize with the cost issue.)

One thing that&#039;s saved me lots of money on ink is my new laser printer, though. (And it&#039;s lots faster than my various inkjets.) The laser printer costs more up front (though mine was a gift), but it doesn&#039;t take long at all, given the amount of printing I do, to make it back, as the cartridges last quite some time.

-- 
Rich</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the same problems, Jonathan. I love getting all the &#8220;free&#8221; stuff but it&#8217;s not so free when you print it out. And word or even text formats work better than .pdf, even though .pdf documents are MUCH prettier, simply because a word document, properly reduced, might print in 1/3 as many pages as a .pdf.</p>
<p>(Printed galleys or ARCs are still better, but I do sympathize with the cost issue.)</p>
<p>One thing that&#8217;s saved me lots of money on ink is my new laser printer, though. (And it&#8217;s lots faster than my various inkjets.) The laser printer costs more up front (though mine was a gift), but it doesn&#8217;t take long at all, given the amount of printing I do, to make it back, as the cartridges last quite some time.</p>
<p>&#8211;<br />
Rich</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.jonathanstrahan.com.au/wp/2008/05/27/sending-me-electronic-files-for-review-and-years-bests/comment-page-1/#comment-151752</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 08:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonathanstrahan.com.au/wp/2008/05/27/sending-me-electronic-files-for-review-and-years-bests/#comment-151752</guid>
		<description>Um, who are you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, who are you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A FAB Query</title>
		<link>http://www.jonathanstrahan.com.au/wp/2008/05/27/sending-me-electronic-files-for-review-and-years-bests/comment-page-1/#comment-151668</link>
		<dc:creator>A FAB Query</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 02:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonathanstrahan.com.au/wp/2008/05/27/sending-me-electronic-files-for-review-and-years-bests/#comment-151668</guid>
		<description>Reading text off the screen is the new &quot;found&quot; art. The stuff I get--Keep me reading off the screen and you just might have something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading text off the screen is the new &#8220;found&#8221; art. The stuff I get&#8211;Keep me reading off the screen and you just might have something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.jonathanstrahan.com.au/wp/2008/05/27/sending-me-electronic-files-for-review-and-years-bests/comment-page-1/#comment-151661</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 02:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonathanstrahan.com.au/wp/2008/05/27/sending-me-electronic-files-for-review-and-years-bests/#comment-151661</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t actually use Ebay at all, no.  But it&#039;s a good idea.  I also find there&#039;s a logistical problem, as well. I have emails with attachments, piles of print out, a thumb drive with copies of files - and so on, and so on. It&#039;s a LOT better than getting nothing, but not as good as an old-fashioned ARC or galley.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t actually use Ebay at all, no.  But it&#8217;s a good idea.  I also find there&#8217;s a logistical problem, as well. I have emails with attachments, piles of print out, a thumb drive with copies of files &#8211; and so on, and so on. It&#8217;s a LOT better than getting nothing, but not as good as an old-fashioned ARC or galley.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A FAB Query</title>
		<link>http://www.jonathanstrahan.com.au/wp/2008/05/27/sending-me-electronic-files-for-review-and-years-bests/comment-page-1/#comment-151660</link>
		<dc:creator>A FAB Query</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 01:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonathanstrahan.com.au/wp/2008/05/27/sending-me-electronic-files-for-review-and-years-bests/#comment-151660</guid>
		<description>You mean you don&#039;t buy ink carts in bunk via eBay? Even with shipping to Down Under, it&#039;s a fraction of what you pay at the local store.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean you don&#8217;t buy ink carts in bunk via eBay? Even with shipping to Down Under, it&#8217;s a fraction of what you pay at the local store.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.jonathanstrahan.com.au/wp/2008/05/27/sending-me-electronic-files-for-review-and-years-bests/comment-page-1/#comment-151610</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 22:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonathanstrahan.com.au/wp/2008/05/27/sending-me-electronic-files-for-review-and-years-bests/#comment-151610</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve certainly done that. But, it still ends up with reading on screen, or covering the cost of a pile of print-out. It works on an occasional basis, but the real problem is that increasingly electronic copies are becoming more and more common.  As to the Sony Reader - I&#039;d heard very mixed things about it, especially when it came to PDFs. I know Charles tried it, and seemed far from sold on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve certainly done that. But, it still ends up with reading on screen, or covering the cost of a pile of print-out. It works on an occasional basis, but the real problem is that increasingly electronic copies are becoming more and more common.  As to the Sony Reader &#8211; I&#8217;d heard very mixed things about it, especially when it came to PDFs. I know Charles tried it, and seemed far from sold on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AAron</title>
		<link>http://www.jonathanstrahan.com.au/wp/2008/05/27/sending-me-electronic-files-for-review-and-years-bests/comment-page-1/#comment-151506</link>
		<dc:creator>AAron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 15:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonathanstrahan.com.au/wp/2008/05/27/sending-me-electronic-files-for-review-and-years-bests/#comment-151506</guid>
		<description>If you have a full version of Adobe Acrobat, and if the .pdf isn&#039;t locked, you can usually save a .pdf as a rich text format file.  Sometimes the formatting gets a little weird.  Afterwards you can reformat the text file for smaller point type and margins, reducing the printing cost.

Or you can do what I did, and buy a Sony Reader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have a full version of Adobe Acrobat, and if the .pdf isn&#8217;t locked, you can usually save a .pdf as a rich text format file.  Sometimes the formatting gets a little weird.  Afterwards you can reformat the text file for smaller point type and margins, reducing the printing cost.</p>
<p>Or you can do what I did, and buy a Sony Reader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.jonathanstrahan.com.au/wp/2008/05/27/sending-me-electronic-files-for-review-and-years-bests/comment-page-1/#comment-151411</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 10:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonathanstrahan.com.au/wp/2008/05/27/sending-me-electronic-files-for-review-and-years-bests/#comment-151411</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve done the same thing, and am happy to continue do so, in limited numbers. The problem I&#039;ve found is that Publicity Depts have moved from being reluctant to distribute electronic copies to sending them out in preference to the expense of sending printed copy.  The sheer volume of e-copy is what&#039;s causing the problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve done the same thing, and am happy to continue do so, in limited numbers. The problem I&#8217;ve found is that Publicity Depts have moved from being reluctant to distribute electronic copies to sending them out in preference to the expense of sending printed copy.  The sheer volume of e-copy is what&#8217;s causing the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Farah</title>
		<link>http://www.jonathanstrahan.com.au/wp/2008/05/27/sending-me-electronic-files-for-review-and-years-bests/comment-page-1/#comment-151410</link>
		<dc:creator>Farah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 10:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonathanstrahan.com.au/wp/2008/05/27/sending-me-electronic-files-for-review-and-years-bests/#comment-151410</guid>
		<description>If I have to print out, I tend to copy and paste into Word these days and print out on 9 point font.  Some of our colleagues do have a penchant for 700 page novels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I have to print out, I tend to copy and paste into Word these days and print out on 9 point font.  Some of our colleagues do have a penchant for 700 page novels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

