And that covers the main fiction categories. I’ve got much less fixed views on most of the remaining categories, so here are a few quick notes.
Best Related Book
I’d probably restrict myself to nominating Farah Mendlesohn and Edward James’ excellent The Cambridge Companion to Science Fiction and Damien Broderick’s terrific (and highly entertaining) x, y, z, t: Dimensions of Science Fiction.
Best Dramatic Presentations
I really don’t care… I guess I’d just give it all to The Incredibles and go home.
Best Professional Editor
Cheryl makes some good points at Emerald City about book editors not getting a fair go. Certainly people like Ginjer Buchanan, Juliet Ulman, David Hartwell, Diana Gill, and Patrick Nielsen Hayden all deserve attention. Still, it all comes back to the magazines. Just on the year we’ve had I’d nominate Ellen Datlow first, followed by Gordon and Gardner. My fourth and fifth slots would go to Juliet Ulman and David Hartwell. Could have been others, but they’re a strong group.
Best Professional Artist
Again, I don’t have a strong feeling here because I don’t have a clear idea of who did what during 2004. I’d probably opt for Les Edwards and John Picacio, for their small press work.
Best SemiProzine
The boss, the big guy, Charles is the only nomination I have. It’ll be interesting to see how the rest of the category fills out.
Best Fanzine
I read very little in the way of fanzines, so I’ll stick with Cheryl and Emerald City.
Best Fan Writer
Probably Cheryl, Langford and Matt Cheney, all of whom do good stuff.
Best Web Site
And Mark and Locus: Online for this one. I do think it’s the best SF site out there, and it would get my vote. I suspect, though, that if people stopped splitting there votes between SciFi.com, SciFiction, and SciFi Weekly – which are all the one site really – they would run away with it.