So, I was reading Charlie’s journal, and he asked the question: “When was the last time that a work of Lovecraftiana won a Hugo award?” As it turned out, it had been Neil Gaiman the year previously for “A Study in Emerald”. Briefly I though, time for a Lovecraftiana anthology. I could… And then I stopped. I took a deep breath. I decided to leave such efforts for those who have a deep love of Lovecraftiana. It was good.

I just read this post of Tim’s, and realised that technically (as reviews editor of news/reviews magazine Locus) I’m a Hugo loser, or at least part of a group of co-losers. And it didn’t hurt a bit. I don’t have a losers party to go to, but I’d say this. I love working for Locus, even when deadlines drive me crazy. It’s a wonderful magazine, and I can’t wait to get to hang out with everyone (except Tim, who won’t be there when I’m there) in Oakland. I’ll be glad when WorldCon is over though, and Charles gets back to Oakland. We talk every weekend pretty much, and I missed it these last couple weeks.

Got an email from Russell Farr, who is at the WorldCon right now. Reminded me that Mike Walsh is running Capclave 2005, a convention with Howard Waldrop as guest. If you’re in the area, you should definitely che’ekidaou’ut. For me, I need to get a copy of the giveaway. Hmmm.

I keep seeing the name of the John W. Campbell Award for Best New Writer written as John W. Campbell Award for Best New Writer [Not a Hugo], adding the words [Not a Hugo]. Obviously that was true this year, with an Elizabeth winning. But, do we need to keep saying it? And what is a Hugo came along who should win in it. Hardly fair.

What an interesting bunch of results. I was delighted to see that Kelly had won for one of my very favorite stories, that Ellen had won for the wonderful job she does at SciFiction, that Charlie got a gong for a story that is a lot of fun, and to see Farah and Elizabeth also picked up well deserved awards. Looking over the various details, I was interested to see that Terry Pratchett declined nomination for Going Postal. I have no idea why, and I have no intention of criticising his decision. The only comment I’d make is that I think he deserves to win the field’s major awards, and am disappointed that voters didn’t have the chance to recognise his achievement with the Hugo. Perhaps a World Fantasy for lifetime achievement would be worth considering at some point.

Although I am amongst the most partisan of Locus‘s supporters, and think that Mark Kelly does a fantastic job with Locus: Online, I can’t help but applaud the Best Website win for SciFiction. It’s an extraordinary achievement, and deserves its award.

One thing I do note with interest, though. A motion has just passed to split the Best Editor Hugo in two, effectively splitting it into an award for short fiction editing and novel editing. That award, if I recall, replaced an earlier “Best Magazine” category. Reading the wording of the Best Website win, it’s presented to SciFiction, Edited by Ellen Datlow. Craig Engler, general manager. SciFiction is a science fiction magazine. Is this effectively a third editor Hugo? Do we need three? Is there, perhaps, a better formulation for these awards? Hmm. BTW, Cheryl is breaking all of this down too.